Practice
Establish baseline conditions and understanding of future changes (in climate-related parameters)
Aspect contributions
How this practice contributes to the green port aspects.
| Aspect | Role | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Climate Adaptation | Core | - |
| Regulatory Compliance | Secondary | - |
| Certification and Benchmarking | Secondary | - |
| Risk Management | Secondary | - |
| Financing (Green & Sustainable) | Secondary | - |
| Development Planning | Secondary | - |
| Engineering Design | Secondary | - |
| Materials Selection | Secondary | - |
| Maintenance | Secondary | - |
| Social Licence and Community Engagement | Secondary | - |
Summary
For ports, a critical step in climate change adaptation and resilience planning is developing a sound understanding of baseline conditions, likely future climate changes, and the associated uncertainties. This includes Climate risk screening, climate data collection, identifying uncertainties.
Because ports are long-lived assets operating in dynamic coastal environments, adaptation planning must account for both gradual changes and extreme events, while remaining robust under uncertain future conditions.
Adaptation planning requires building an evidence base that identifies relevant climate drivers, establishes baseline conditions, and assesses how these may change under different climate scenarios before progressing to detailed risk assessment. Climate data selection must reflect asset sensitivity, planning horizon, decision context and available expertise, recognizing that data vary across spatial and temporal scales.
Relevant climate parameters are identified by linking potential impacts to drivers such as sea-level rise, rainfall, winds, waves, river flows, temperature extremes and sediment processes. Historical data support trend and threshold analysis, while scenario-based assessments help explore conditions beyond past experience. Given growing uncertainty, particularly for complex processes such as sea-level rise and waves, using multiple scenarios, models and adaptive decision-making approaches is essential for resilient port planning.
Details
For ports, it is an essential step in the climate change adaptation and resilience process to develop a comprehensive understanding of baselines conditions and likely future changes, in both drivers of change and impacts. Further, given the uncertainty surrounding climate change, understanding uncertainty in climate change projections and being adaptative to such uncertainty is critical.
Ports are particularly exposed to various climatic hazards, due to their locations along open coasts or in low-lying estuaries and deltas that make them susceptible to the impacts of rising sea levels, storm surges, waves and winds as well as fluvial and pluvial flooding (Izaguirre et al. 2021). Without effective adaptation, these risks are projected to intensify under climate change (Izaguirre et al. 2021).
The climate change adaptation planning process requires the development of an evidence base to understand how future climate change may affect critical maritime and inland navigation assets, operations and systems. The objective is to identify relevant climate parameters and processes, establish baseline conditions, and assess how these may change under different climate change scenarios, before progressing to risk assessment (PIANC 2020).
The process begins by establishing climate information needs, recognizing that climate data vary widely in spatial and temporal scale, from global to site-specific and from long-term averages to extreme events. Decisions on data requirements depend on asset location, susceptibility to hazards, planning horizon, adaptation objectives, and available technical expertise. Establishing robust baseline conditions is essential, as these form the reference point for assessing future change.
Relevant climate parameters and processes are identified by linking known or potential impacts to climate drivers such as sea level rise, precipitation, winds, waves, river flows, temperature extremes, sediment transport and visibility. While historical impacts provide important insight, additional parameters should also be considered through scenario-based “what-if” analyses, recognizing that future conditions may exceed past experience. Stakeholder engagement is critical at this stage, drawing on operational knowledge to ensure all relevant vulnerabilities are captured.
Collation of baseline climate data, including long-term records of average conditions and extreme events concerning the above supports trend analysis, threshold identification, and comparison with future projections. Where data gaps exist, local monitoring may need to be initiated.
Future climate conditions are explored using climate change scenarios, most commonly IPCC Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) and, since the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report, Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs). The number of scenarios considered should align with the adaptation planning horizon, with greater emphasis on multiple scenarios and uncertainty for long-term planning beyond mid-century. Changes in the frequency and severity of extreme events must be explicitly considered, as these pose significant risks to infrastructure and operations.
Baseline and projected data are analyzed using methods appropriate to data quality and decision needs, with explicit recognition of uncertainty and data limitations.
Understanding uncertainty in climate change projections is essential. The IPCC (Mastrandrea et al., 2010) has developed a consistent framework and terminology to describe uncertainty in climate change projections, distinguishing between confidence in scientific understanding and the likelihood of specific outcomes. Uncertainty increases as projections move from well-understood variables like temperature to more complex processes such as sea level rise, waves, sediment transport and ecosystem impacts, all of which are significant for ports.
-Regional projections vary significantly between scenarios, reflecting uncertainties in future emissions, climate system responses and internal variability. Using multiple models and scenarios is therefore essential. For navigation and port planning, emphasis should be placed on understanding trends and managing uncertainty through scenario selection, sensitivity testing and adaptive, resilient decision-making (PIANC, 2023).
Enabling factors
Climate adaptation can be strongly assisted through laws and regulations, such as those that, in some jurisdictions, require climate risk assessment, disclosure and resilience planning. National strategies in particular, such as National Adaptation Plans, as well as sector strategies and institutional frameworks can also assist greatly. Clear national policy signals that translate international commitments into sector-specific expectations for ports are a key enabler: where a national adaptation plan, a port sector master plan, or a sovereign climate commitment provides a credible trajectory, port authorities, operators, and financiers align more readily. The policy environment (laws, regulations, strategies, institutional frameworks) within climate change understanding and climate change planning is a rapidly developing landscape. Of particular note are the requirements for ports to undertake reporting and inherent as an incentive is to reduce risk to the ports itself, assisting with planning and avoiding costs. Ring-fenced green finance windows, including concessional capital from multilateral development banks and the ADB-managed ASEAN Catalytic Green Finance Facility (ACGF), are a critical enabler for first-of-kind investment. Integration of port-relevant activities into the ASEAN Taxonomy for Sustainable Finance provides a further enabler by giving lenders and issuers a shared reference.
Climate adaptation can be assisted through guidelines and improved standards. Further, the expectations of standards in climate adaptation planning varies greatly, therefore standardization of standards is an enabler. Regional knowledge exchange has emerged as an enabler in its own right. DMC ports benefit from structured opportunities to learn from peers in comparable operating and regulatory environments, alongside examples from other regions. Anchor ports that publish transparent sustainability disclosures and host peer delegations play a catalytic role for surrounding ports in their national and sub-regional contexts. Structured ADB technical assistance, particularly for project preparation, gap analysis, and governance strengthening, can help ports convert ambition into investment-ready projects.
Sustainable procurement enables climate-resilient port development by embedding environmental, social and governance considerations into investment, design, construction and operational decisions. Through lifecycle-based purchasing, climate-risk criteria, supplier accountability and resilience standards, procurement helps ensure infrastructure is adaptable, durable and aligned with long-term sustainability objectives, reducing climate vulnerabilities while supporting responsible economic development and supply chain resilience.
Finally, partnerships with shipping lines, cargo owners, tenants, and energy utilities are recurring enablers; no port advances its green agenda successfully in isolation from its value chain. Some climate adaptation measures in particular are heavily reliant on partnerships and collaboration, including those requiring additional land, share land uses and nature-based adaptation.