Skip to main content
Green Ports Toolkit

Practice

Material Transport

Planning and DevelopmentOperations

Aspect contributions

How this practice contributes to the green port aspects.

Summary

Materials transport is a critical factor in sustainable port construction and operation, significantly influencing carbon emissions, costs, and overall environmental performance. Ports require large volumes of materials such as aggregates, steel, and concrete, and the sourcing, distance, and method of transport, often referred to as embodied transport energy, play a major role in their environmental footprint. Green port practices prioritize locally sourced or reused materials, such as dredged sediments, to reduce transport distances, emissions, and costs while supporting regional economies.

Transport mode is equally important. Road transport, although flexible, has higher emissions per tonne-kilometer compared to rail or waterborne modes (IPCC, 2014), on a direct-emissions basis. Where routes, loads and distances allow, projects can favor shipping, barges, and rail for bulk materials to lower emissions and ease congestion. Material properties also influence efficiency. Lightweight, durable, and prefabricated components can reduce transport loads, trips, and long-term replacement needs. Prefabrication can further enhance sustainability by consolidating deliveries, minimizing waste, and shortening construction timelines.

Circular economy principles are increasingly adopted, promoting the reuse and recycling of materials such as concrete and steel to reduce reliance on virgin resources and associated transport. Digital logistics tools also improve efficiency through route optimization and reduced empty trips.

Remote and island port projects, including those in archipelagic south east Asia and the pacific, face additional challenges, including long supply chains, high costs, and logistical risks (PIANC, 2008a). In these contexts, material selection emphasizes durability, modularity, and local availability to minimize transport demands. Overall, integrating efficient sourcing, low-carbon transport modes, durable materials, and optimized logistics is essential to reducing the environmental footprint of port development.

Details

Materials transport is a critical consideration in material selection for port construction and operation, particularly within the framework of green port practices, which aim to reduce environmental impacts and improve sustainability across the port lifecycle. Ports are material-intensive infrastructures involving large volumes of aggregates, steel, concrete, and equipment. The way these materials are sourced (see above practice), transported, and handled significantly influences overall carbon emissions, operational efficiency, and environmental performance.

One of the primary concerns in materials transport is the distance between source and site, often referred to as “transport miles” or “embodied transport energy.” Materials sourced from distant suppliers typically require long-haul transport via road, rail, or maritime shipping, each with associated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Hammond and Jones, 2011). This is particularly relevant for remote locations (see below). In green port design, there is a strong preference for locally sourced materials, which can reduce emissions and costs while also supporting regional economies. For example, using locally dredged sediments for reclamation or reusing on-site materials can decrease the need for external transport.

The transport of dredged material plays a major role in shaping the environmental footprint of port maintenance and development. Traditionally, sediments were often transported long distances to offshore disposal sites, increasing fuel use, vessel emissions, and operational costs. However, modern practices are shifting toward the local reuse of dredged material, which significantly improves resource efficiency and reduces environmental impact (see other practices).

When suitable sediments are retained and applied nearby, for example in land reclamation, beach nourishment, or habitat restoration, transport distances are minimized, leading to lower greenhouse gas emissions and reduced energy consumption. Local use also replaces the need for quarrying and transporting virgin materials, further conserving natural resources. In contrast, far offshore disposal requires extended vessel trips and offers little material recovery benefit. By prioritizing proximity and beneficial reuse, ports can decrease emissions intensity while supporting circular material flows, making dredging operations more aligned with sustainable and low-carbon port strategies.

The mode of transport is another important factor influencing sustainability outcomes. Road transport, while flexible, generally has higher emissions per tonne-kilometer than rail or waterborne transport (IEA, 2019; IPCC, 2014). This comparison is on a direct-emissions basis; lifecycle results depend on vehicle, fuel, load, route and handling. Where possible, green port projects prioritize bulk transport via ships or barges, especially for heavy construction materials such as rock armor or cement. Rail transport is also favored over trucking for inland connections due to lower emissions intensity and reduced congestion impacts. Consequently, material selection is often aligned with supply chains and transport methodologies that can leverage lower-carbon transport modes.

Material choices can also influence transport efficiency through weight, durability, and modularity. Lightweight or prefabricated materials can reduce transport loads and trips, thereby lowering fuel consumption. Similarly, durable materials with longer service lives reduce the frequency of replacement cycles and associated transport impacts over time (PIANC, 2014). Prefabrication further supports efficient logistics by allowing components to be manufactured off-site and delivered in optimized loads, minimizing waste and site disturbance.

From an operational perspective, ports are increasingly adopting circular economy principles, which emphasize reuse, recycling, and recovery of materials. This approach reduces reliance on new material transport and lowers lifecycle emissions. For example, recycled concrete aggregates or steel can replace virgin materials (European Commission, 2020), often with shorter supply chains and lower transport requirements. Additionally, ports may implement reverse logistics systems, enabling waste materials generated during operation to be transported efficiently to recycling or reprocessing facilities.

Digital technologies and logistics planning tools also play a role in optimizing materials transport. Supply chain optimization, route planning, and real-time tracking systems can reduce inefficiencies such as empty return trips and fuel wastage. These strategies align with green port objectives by improving both economic and environmental performance. See Digital Technology Aspect and associated Practices.

Prefabrication in port construction can reduce transport-related emissions. Prefabricated components are manufactured in controlled factory environments where material use is optimized, waste is minimized, and loads can be consolidated into fewer, more efficient deliveries. This can reduce the number of trips required compared to transporting raw materials individually to site. Larger, standardized components can be shipped using high-capacity, lower-emission modes such as barges or rail. Furthermore, prefabrication shortens on-site construction time, decreasing the need for repeated material deliveries and associated fuel use, which can contribute to lower overall greenhouse gas emissions and improved logistical efficiency.

Material transport to islands or remote locations, such as those in the Pacific or archipelagic Southeast Asia, presents unique logistical and sustainability challenges. Limited local material availability often necessitates long-distance shipping, increasing costs, lead times, and carbon emissions. Dependence on maritime transport can introduce risks related to weather disruptions, port capacity, and handling constraints for large or heavy components. Consequently, material selection prioritizes high durability (see Material Selection Practice), low maintenance (see Engineering Design Aspect), and suitability for modular or prefabricated delivery to reduce future resupply needs. Where feasible, the use of locally available or naturally occurring materials, such as reused dredged material or local aggregates where extraction is permitted and environmentally acceptable, can reduce transport demand and environmental impact.

Materials transport is a key determinant of sustainability in port construction and operation. Effective material selection must consider not only the properties and costs of materials but also their transport-related impacts, including distance, mode, and logistics efficiency. By prioritizing local sourcing, low-carbon transport modes, durable and reusable materials, and efficient logistics systems, green port practices can significantly reduce the environmental footprint of infrastructure development

Enabling factors

Policy Environment

Green port frameworks, freight emissions reporting requirements and modal shift policies that make transport impacts visible in material decisions. Emissions tracking standards allow transport distance and mode to be weighed alongside material performance rather than treated as a separate logistics matter.

Improved Technologies & Standards

Supply chain optimization tools, logistics technologies, and emissions tracking standards help identify lower-emission transport pathways, improve freight efficiency, and reduce transport-related carbon impacts.

Sustainable Procurement

Procurement strategies that favor local or regional suppliers, consolidate deliveries, and require reporting of transport emissions can significantly reduce the environmental footprint of material movement to and from port projects.

Partnerships & Collaboration

Governments, port authorities, contractors and regional suppliers coordinating sourcing and delivery. Local and regional supplier relationships, consolidated deliveries and supplier reporting of transport emissions all depend on collaboration across the construction supply chain.