Skip to main content
Green Ports Toolkit
Global · Case study

Port of Long Beach, United States - Whole-of-Life Value versus Point-of-Delivery Cost

Long Beach, United StatesNot specified

The Port of Long Beach provides a useful example of how whole-of-life (WOL) thinking can be incorporated into port infrastructure planning and material selection rather than focusing exclusively on point-of-delivery cost. As one of the world's busiest container ports, the port has developed sustainability frameworks intended to integrate environmental, economic and operational considerations into capital project delivery. The objective is not only to deliver infrastructure at the lowest upfront cost, but also to better understand long-term performance, maintenance requirements and sustainability outcomes (Port of Long Beach, 2013, Port of Long Beach, n.d.).

To support this objective, the Port of Long Beach developed its Sustainable Design and Construction Guidelines, which were created to integrate sustainability into capital projects, quantify sustainable project attributes, provide sustainability metrics, and create a framework for tracking the advantages and disadvantages of sustainable design measures throughout project delivery. The guidelines specifically identify benefits including improved decision-making, standardized project delivery, and the ability to measure sustainability improvements over time (Port of Long Beach, 2013).

One area where lifecycle thinking can influence procurement decisions is pavement infrastructure. Container terminals are subjected to heavy repetitive loading from port equipment and freight vehicles, making maintenance costs and operational disruptions significant considerations over the life of an asset. During the Port of Long Beach Pier E Expansion Project, roller-compacted concrete (RCC) pavement was used for new wharf and container handling areas. According to the RCC Pavement Council, key benefits of RCC in port applications include long pavement life, minimal maintenance requirements, resistance to rutting and potholes, resistance to fuel and hydraulic fluid spills, and cost-effective construction (RCC Pavement Council, n.d.). These characteristics can reduce future maintenance interventions and associated operational disruption compared with alternatives requiring more frequent repair.

The experience of the Port of Long Beach demonstrates how sustainable infrastructure delivery extends beyond construction-phase costs. Through the application of sustainability assessment frameworks and the selection of durable infrastructure materials, the port has sought to better account for future maintenance and operational considerations during project planning. This reflects a central principle of green port design: infrastructure solutions that may not have the lowest upfront cost can deliver greater value over their operating life through improved durability, reduced maintenance requirements, and lower cumulative environmental impacts (Port of Long Beach, 2013).

Transferability

DMC port authorities can adopt sustainable design and construction guidelines that require durability, maintenance needs and whole-of-life cost to be weighed alongside upfront price when selecting materials. Heavily loaded areas such as container yards and wharf aprons are a good place to start, because pavement repairs there disrupt operations. Ports should record maintenance costs and downtime for each pavement type, so later projects can compare options on evidence rather than on purchase price alone.

Sources

All information used for this case study was based on publicly available resources.